Try PayerLaunch · made-up examples
Follow a claim across two reports.
Open example claims, record a follow-up step, then compare a new report to see your earlier work stay.
No account or file needed. Nothing reaches a payer. Reload clears this demo; Reset demo restores the first example report.
Start here / Open made-up claims
Open four example claims.
No file or account needed. Preview the examples, open them, then choose a claim to try a follow-up step.
Start with the examples above.
Choose Preview example claims, then Open example claims. You’ll see four made-up claims and can choose one to try a follow-up step.
Proposed input path · not connected today
Where would the report come from?
- 1. Practice softwareStaff run an agreed claims follow-up report in their practice-management system.
- 2. Verified exportSave one supported report format after its fields and meanings have been checked.
- 3. Staff uploadUpload the saved file, check the preview, then accept the comparison.
- 4. Compare and continueSee changed source facts beside the assignment, notes and earlier reviews.
That is the proposed journey. Today’s samples are independently fictional and use our invented format. No actual PMS export is supported; no payment or PMS API connection is implemented or selected.
Example fields and the work involved
- Claim + location ID
- SYN-1042 / DEMO-LOC-01 — identify the same item across reports.
- Amount + source status
- $840 / Missing attachment — facts to compare, separate from staff review.
- Source update + report time
- 14 April 2030 — show when facts changed and how old the export is.
- Coverage
- Partial — absence from the next file does not mean paid or resolved.
A future user would choose the agreed report and date/location settings, export it, then upload it again for each comparison. We need to test how much preparation that takes and whether required fields are available; no copy-and-paste or automatic sync is promised.
In the demo, assign SYN-1042 and review its attachment checklist. The next sample changes its amount to $865 and asks for comparison. Your assignment and earlier review stay visible, while the changed facts need a new review. An absent item also remains open. This lets you inspect why work needs attention without treating yesterday’s review as approval of today’s facts.
The demo stays in this browser. Only independently fictional samples are accepted; no real claim or patient data.
See product status →Express interest